Guidance for manufacturers on reporting adverse incidents involving Software as a Medical Device under the vigilance system
Overview
Any event which meets the three reporting criteria (MEDDEV 2.12/1 rev 8, 5.1.1) is considered an adverse incident and must be reported to the MHRA.
For software as a medical device (SaMD), indirect harm is the most probable outcome of adverse incidents and may occur as a consequence of the medical decision, action taken/not taken by healthcare professionals and/ or patients and the public based on information or result(s) provided by the SaMD.
Examples of indirect harm include:
- misdiagnosis
- delayed diagnosis
- delayed treatment
- inappropriate treatment
- absence of treatment or
- transfusion of inappropriate materials.
Examples of what indirect harm may be caused by:
- imprecise results
- inadequate quality controls
- inadequate calibration
- false positive or
- false negative results.
For self-testing devices, a medical decision may be made by the USER of the device who is also the patient.
This content is available under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
External Links
Key Information
Jurisdiction: UK - UK-wide
License: Open Government Licence v3.0